Wakfu

Season two of Wakfu is well underway, and somehow I neglected to ever post about this odd French cartoon. Based on a sequel to a French MMORPG (Dofus), Wakfu’s first season followed the adventures of Yugo, a young boy seeking out his long-lost family with the help of a number of companions, each based on character archetypes from the game. Alongside this was the story of a megalomaniac time mage hell-bent on accumulating enough Wakfu (a kind of mystical power source found in living things) to send himself back in time to right a past wrong.

The art style is distinct and the animation style somewhat odd to start with. You see, Wakfu is generated not by traditional pen-and-paper means but via Flash animation. An excellent sample to preview the stylistic character designs and animation style would be from season one, episode one, when Nox the time mage confronts an old man with an infant Yugo. The production company clearly has a certain European flair to it.

Character development is slow in coming, refusing to touch the main characters nearly at all over the course of a full season. I understand the necessity of this, as the show is practically an advertisement for Ankama’s upcoming Wakfu computer game (sequel to Dofus). Each of Yugo’s companions needs to remain a paragon of his character class; Ruel must remain an unrepentant greedy Enutrof, Tristepin must remain a headstrong overconfident Iop. It just wouldn’t do to confuse the RPG-buying public about what they’re getting into.

Season two picks up after shortly after the first one trailed off, with the same core cast of protagonists. Just enough time has passed for their deeds and heroic sacrifices to have become a legend of sorts. I highly recommend checking this series out.

Postscript: I find it highly entertaining to hear French voice actors actually use the phrase “ooh la-la” in dialog. It’s like hearing a Mexican say “ay caramba.”

Hyperinflation and You

As somebody who listens to talk radio and watches news networks on a regular basis, I see a lot of ads from folks like Monex or Goldline. The basic premise is supported by the echo-machine narratives told by the newscasters and pundits, in a kind of disinformation kabuki dance. It goes like this:

The U.S. federal government runs at a deficit. The deficit currently stands at a very large number and contributes greatly to an even larger federal debt. Because the federal government owes this money in U.S. Dollars and the federal government can print additional money to honor these debts, the existence of this debt devalues the money itself. As the value of a dollar decreases, any asset that is defined strictly in terms of dollars would also decrease in value, so buy gold and be wealthy after the United States crumbles into financial oblivion. Gold is presented as both a supremely secure value and a good yield.

This is a pretty attractive chain of reasoning, if only it all added up that way. Rather than listen to the radio and TV pundits (whose paychecks are made possible by advertising from these gold-peddlers), let’s cast about looking for some other source of financial expertise. Let’s keep in mind that everybody has their interests and factors that influence what they say about markets. How about we don’t look at what anybody says about hyperinflation and the price of gold, and instead look at the actions of the bond markets?

When the United States needs another $80 billion to bomb an Afghan village into the dirt, the money can come from three sources: they can levy taxes and fees to replenish the treasury, they can print additional currency to produce the funds directly, or they can sell bonds on the open market. For political and practical purposes, the government is overwhelmingly predisposed to sell bonds. This is what many politicians refer to as “putting it on the credit card.” During the initial bond sale, the interest rates given are determined by auction. This means the Treasury’s bond yields reflect the value investors were willing to place on the good credit of the American government. Investors responsible for about 1.6 trillion dollars (the most recent estimate of our annual deficit) need to weigh all their options, including private financial instruments, securities, and commodities against the perceived dangers of economic and political instability and various actors’ credit-worthiness and arrive at an interest rate that is high enough to merit investment in Uncle Sam’s promise to return payment. Since U.S. Treasury bonds are paid in dollars, inflation has to be taken into account in that decision process.

Bearing in mind that you don’t play around with hundreds of millions or billions of dollars on the open market without knowing your stuff (let’s assume a little faith in the intelligence and self-interest of big-time investors), the yield on a Treasury note needs to at least equal the expected inflation rate or it’s probably not worth buying. As of this writing, a ten-year note will pay out 3.58%. This means that the market-at-large thinks that inflation will be something short of that, averaged out, over the next ten years. We can figure out exactly what the market expects inflation to be by looking at the cost of inflation-protected bonds (which yield a guaranteed rate over whatever inflation ends up happening), which are at 2.45%. 3.58% (10-year bond) minus 2.45% (inflation-protected bond) is 1.13%.

Folks looking to sell you gold, and folks looking to sell ad time for folks looking to sell you gold, say we’re looking down the barrel at a sure-fired guaranteed financial apocalypse. $1,600,000,000,000.00 in bond sales this year says those people are full of it.

As for the notion that gold is a supremely-secure investment (by golly, it’s been valuable since the days of Abraham!), tell this to anybody who invested in gold at $1781.00 per ounce (adjusted for inflation) back in 1980. They can fetch $1432.00 for it today. If they’d bought a thirty-year treasury bond that same year, they’d have locked in about 9.8% at its lowest yield in June. Inflation since then has totaled 166.29% (cumulative), so a $10,000 investment in the T-bill would have yielded $165,222.89 in June of 2010. The $10,000 investment in gold at June 1980 prices (average was $672) would fetch you $21,309.52 at today’s price. Just keeping up with inflation would have fetched $26,500 or so.

Don’t be a sucker, and keep in mind when some chalkboard-scribbling pinhead is trying to get your scared about muslims and blacks and unions, they’re just warming you up for their advertisers.

Four years later

Did anybody really need an NFL game to be postponed for snow to know that somebody had misplaced this country’s collective backbone? I’d like to think we all learned that at least four years ago today, when guerrilla marketing got mistaken for lite-brite terrorism.

I think today would make a great opportunity to everybody to take a deep breath, count to ten, and realize that islamist terrorists do not pose an existential threat to western civilization. Neither does the cartoon network.