<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stacking &#8211; Special Cases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://burrowowl.net/wordpress/200209/stacking-special-cases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://burrowowl.net/wordpress/200209/stacking-special-cases/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:21:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Burrowowl</title>
		<link>http://burrowowl.net/wordpress/200209/stacking-special-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Burrowowl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2004 22:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burrowowl.net/wordpress/?p=45#comment-53</guid>
		<description>cute. no spamming on my blog, please.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cute. no spamming on my blog, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burrowowl</title>
		<link>http://burrowowl.net/wordpress/200209/stacking-special-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Burrowowl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2002 18:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burrowowl.net/wordpress/?p=45#comment-52</guid>
		<description>I got that +5 directly from the 1st printing version of the DMG.  The Errata file available at tsr.com has no note of this being changed.  I think that a +6 is reasonable, but the number came straight from the horse&#039;s mouth.

The +5 limitation was probably intended specifically for magical weapons and armor, which traditionally haven&#039;t had greater than +5 bonuses.  Exceptions generally apply to any rule, so the +12 Hackmaster sword can certainly exist if the DM says so ^_^

A +6 enhancement bonus to a core Attribute (such as Strength or Charisma) would make sense, as the Attribute Modifiers increment once per every two points of the Attribute, for a clean extra 3 on that Attribute&#039;s modifier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got that +5 directly from the 1st printing version of the DMG.  The Errata file available at tsr.com has no note of this being changed.  I think that a +6 is reasonable, but the number came straight from the horse&#8217;s mouth.</p>
<p>The +5 limitation was probably intended specifically for magical weapons and armor, which traditionally haven&#8217;t had greater than +5 bonuses.  Exceptions generally apply to any rule, so the +12 Hackmaster sword can certainly exist if the DM says so ^_^</p>
<p>A +6 enhancement bonus to a core Attribute (such as Strength or Charisma) would make sense, as the Attribute Modifiers increment once per every two points of the Attribute, for a clean extra 3 on that Attribute&#8217;s modifier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pvrhye</title>
		<link>http://burrowowl.net/wordpress/200209/stacking-special-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>pvrhye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2002 22:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burrowowl.net/wordpress/?p=45#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Actually, enhancement bonus&#039;s to stats cap at 6 for less than epic items.

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, enhancement bonus&#8217;s to stats cap at 6 for less than epic items.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
