<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tax &amp; Spend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://burrowowl.net/wordpress/200610/tax_spend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://burrowowl.net/wordpress/200610/tax_spend/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 22:16:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burrowowl</title>
		<link>http://burrowowl.net/wordpress/200610/tax_spend/comment-page-1/#comment-18655</link>
		<dc:creator>Burrowowl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burrowowl.net/wordpress/200610/tax_spend/#comment-18655</guid>
		<description>Both of these went down yesterday, though I was somewhat alarmed by how close it was on the cigarette tax.  I&#039;m not entirely convinced that a &quot;no&quot; vote on 87 was the best outcome here, but I was pretty split on that one all along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both of these went down yesterday, though I was somewhat alarmed by how close it was on the cigarette tax.  I&#8217;m not entirely convinced that a &#8220;no&#8221; vote on 87 was the best outcome here, but I was pretty split on that one all along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

